Monday, February 25, 2013

The Quality of the AMWA Annual Conference Depends on You!


This year, AMWA brought the development of the annual conference to you, and you have just a few days remaining to make it yours. For the first time, this year AMWA solicited its members—and beyond—for all types of conference sessions. This means that the quality of the programming at the 2013 Annual Conference depends on you and the proposals you submit!

Whether it’s an open session, a how-to session, a roundtable discussion, a poster, or a new type of session, it’s offered only if you propose it. Whether it’s a session you’ve presented at AMWA before or it’s a new idea, you must propose it. Detecting a theme to this message?

The theme of the 2013 conference is Expanding Your Horizons, to reflect the professional growth you’ll gain from attending the conference. Presenting at the conference will enhance your professional growth, and there’s a program format for everyone.

✭ Are you a seasoned medical communicator with a wide network? Then contact some colleagues and propose a panel discussion on a topic within your specialty area.

✭ Do you have an efficient way of accomplishing a task or process? Why not share your practical advice in a how-to session?

✭ Are you just starting out as a presenter? Leading a roundtable discussion is a great first step.

✭ Do you and a colleague find yourself on different sides of an issue? Get together to present a pro/con debate.

✭ Are you skilled in computer software or applications? Share your skills in a hands-on demonstration.

✭ Have you done research in medical communication? Present it in a poster. (This option is good if you really don’t want to speak in front of a group of people.)

As you know, AMWA represents medical writers and editors in a wide range of work settings. To meet all those needs, we’re looking for a variety of topics. We’re particularly interested in a few topics, such as
Technology (social media, e-learning, mobile apps)
Communication theory (comprehension, usability)
Writing for lay audiences
Health care reform
Work relationships (collaboration, team building)
Business aspects of freelancing

Here’s an important point to remember. In today’s economy, some employers will support travel expenses to attend a professional conference only for employees who make a presentation at the event. So presenting may be the only way you get to the AMWA annual conference without dipping into your own pocket.

And you’re going to want to be at the 2013 AMWA Annual Conference. You’ll hear representatives from the FDA and exciting award speakers, have outstanding networking opportunities, and meet a variety of vendors in the exhibit hall. And don’t underestimate the conference location of Columbus, OH. Columbus is a vibrant city, with more than 45 restaurants within walking distance, a host of interesting neighborhoods, and the Columbus Zoo and Aquarium (a short ride away). In short, Columbus offers a great deal for your extra-conference activities.

Proposing a session for the 2013 AMWA Annual Conference is easy. Just go to the AMWA website conference page, complete the proposal form, and submit. The Annual Conference Committee is reviewing proposals and will respond to all submitters by April.

As with any new process, AMWA’s new process for conference programming was slow to start. That’s why we filled the social media airwaves with reminders. We also know that you’re a deadline-oriented lot, so we expect a landslide of proposals on Thursday, February 28, the much-noted deadline. Don’t let us—or yourself—down.

Monday, October 22, 2012

So You Want to Write A Book (Open Session 1)


By Amy Karon

At AMWA's recent national conference, attendees chuckled and scribbled notes while authors and former journalists Alisa Bowman and Debra Gordon dispelled myths and offered practical tips on breaking into the book business.

The two know the market. Bowman spent several years as an editor at Runner’s World magazine before her husband negotiated her first book contract during a magazine gala at FAO Schwartz.

“I loved my job at Runners World,” said Bowman, who has since ghostwritten* and co-authored seven New York Times bestsellers. “But it was apparent to me that I could make much more money working for myself.”

Gordon’s titles include When Sex Hurts and The Idiot’s Guide to Type 2 Diabetes, and, with her husband, a fellow enthusiast, Wine on Tuesdays. “We managed to do it with our marriage intact,” she grinned.

Read on for Bowman and Gordon’s advice on taking nonfiction health and medical books from inspiration to publication.

Tip: Books published under your own name often pay little. 

In traditional publishing, Gordon said, authors receive only about 15 percent of book sales, and that first goes to repay the publishing company’s advance. “The vast majority of authors never receive royalties,” she added. “Write a book because you want the experience and exposure.”

But self-publishing and e-books have gained popularity as potentially lucrative alternatives. Authors pay a self-publishing company for services they choose, such as copy editing and printing, Bowman said. Because no agent or publisher are involved, the author earns 100 percent of the sale price of every book and can still sell it on Amazon.com.

Another way to make money by writing books is to ghostwrite or co-author with someone else, an accepted practice in the publishing world.

“Most of the bestsellers out there are written by people like Alisa and me,” said Gordon, adding that she just signed a $70,000 contract for a book on mobile health.

To break in, tell clinicians and academics you can help them write books for consumer audiences. If you see a study you think can make a book, contact the authors and pitch the idea.

Tip: Unless you self-publish, you’ll need to hire an agent. 

Writers can be so emotionally invested in a project that they accept tens of thousands of dollars less than they should, Gordon said. But an agent’s job is to negotiate, and she or he won’t shy away from getting the best deal possible.

Agents also can serve as liaisons between a medical writer, the person they’d like to write for, and that author’s agent, Gordon added. That approach can spare writers from burning bridges with medical professionals they may have worked with for years.

Tip: Publishers won’t pay for a great book idea, even if it comes with a cover letter and outline. 

To successfully pitch a publisher, you need a good proposal and marketing plan, Gordon said. Proposals tend to run 50 pages without a sample chapter, which some publishers also require.

Don’t write proposals for free, cautioned Gordon, adding that she charges about $8,000 whether a publisher accepts a proposal or not. “I tell clients, I don’t go to Las Vegas and gamble,” she said, “and I don’t gamble with my business.”

Proposals should focus on what makes the book sellable and unique. Perhaps it will include patient narratives, or a sidebar with the latest advice on disease management.  Add a detailed marketing plan.

“I think this is almost more important than what’s in the book,” Gordon said. For example, is your blog receiving a lot of hits? Do you have a mailing list you can use to promote the book? Do you or your co-authors speak at medical meetings or other venues? Can you secure a high-flying expert to write a cover blurb?

A proposal’s table of contents should list each section and chapter, Gordon added. She writes the first two paragraphs of every chapter and the major topics she’ll go on to cover.

Tip: Don’t plan to blow your whole advance on a home remodeling project. Use it to cover your essential needs while you write. 

Advances are usually paid a third or a quarter at a time over months or years, Bowman said. They must pay for illustrations and marketing consultants, such as search engine optimization experts or people who will help secure deals to write guest posts on blogs.

Tip: Tackle a book as you would any other project–by outlining and breaking it into pieces. 

Gordon does not turn down all other assignments while writing. “Instead of telling yourself you need to write 80,000 words,” she added, “tell yourself you need to write one chapter and turn it in by the end of the month.”

Bowman calculates how many chapters and words she must write every week, keeping in mind that her pace will be slower at first because of time spent researching. “If you’re in a panic at the end, you’re not going to be able to write a great book,” she said, especially because the first chapter must convince customers to pay for the product.

Tip: Book writing requires skillful communication and ego management. If you can’t work with your co-authors, agent, and editor, you might not get another book deal, Bowman said. “This is a word-of-mouth business,” she added. “I very rarely have marketed myself.”

If a co-author has an idea Bowman knows will not work in the book, she suggests it become another book or a blog post. Gordon tells co-authors it’s their book and they have the final word on its contents, but that it’s her responsibility to share what she knows of the market and intended audience.

If the book targets people who don’t know much about science, for example, Gordon makes sure co-authors understand that dense medical prose could harm readability and sales.

Bowman said she has only cancelled a book deal once, and that was when a co-author repeatedly took others’ ideas without credit, even after she talked to him about it. “It was the only time I’ve broken up with a client,” she added. “But I do not regret that decision.”

Tip: Length matters. Stick to the agreed-upon word count. Publishers study consumer behavior to set a book’s price point, and price depends on number of pages, said Bowman.

“You don’t want your book to be the most expensive one in the category,” she added. “You also really hurt your editor’s job of making your book better if you come in way over the word count.”  Publishers have even canceled book deals when drafts are too long or short, she said.

If you choose to write an e-book, study the market. Short e-books are selling the most copies on Amazon now, Bowman noted, partly because readers face time crunches.

Tip: Word of mouth won’t turn you into a household name. You have to market yourself. Books only stay in the store for 3 months, Bowman said. To create the biggest impact possible during that period, you must generate buzz before the book comes out.

Publishers also expect authors to do much of their own marketing these days. That means learning about search engine optimization and social media. Bowman and Gordon suggested getting on a local TV station, such as the Fox channel’s morning programs.

“You have to know as much about marketing, interpersonal skills, and being an entrepreneur as you do about words,” Bowman said. “You don’t want this to be your only book. You really want it to make a splash so you can write a second and a third.”


*Editor's Note: This article discusses ghostwriting in the context of books written for the consumer audience. Ghostwriting of medical research manuscripts in peer-reviewed journals is considered to be an unethical practice by many organizations, including AMWA. For more information about AMWA's position on the importance of acknowledging the contributions of medical communicators, please see http://www.amwa.org/default.asp?id=308.


Thursday, October 11, 2012

Workshops at the AMWA Annual Meeting vs. Home Study


by Mark Bowlby

As a newbie to AMWA, but as an experienced scientific meeting attendee, I’ve been curious as to how AMWA workshops at the annual meeting would compare to the home study courses. I’ve attended several of the essential skills workshops at this year’s annual meeting in Sacramento, and they’ve been a great experience—not just for the instructor’s knowledge that is on display, but also for the experience and skills that the audience brings.

Workshops combine the experience of home study, in the form of homework to be completed prior to the meeting, with a classroom setting which combines lecture, class discussion and group exercises. The workshop venue encompasses a mixture of new and experienced students, led by a passionate and expert workshop leader. The high quality of the leaders has not been a surprise; however, the knowledge and interest that the students all bring to the table has been a bonus. Indeed, the breadth of experience and diverse job functions that are brought together for this brief time is part of the key to this learning experience.

So how do the workshops compare to home study, of which I’ve taken 3 courses? They are similar in nature, but different in form. Home study allows a slower pace of learning, shorter bursts of learning, but also a very in-depth level of study. Workshops, however, are an intense 3 hour block with information coming at you quickly. Home study allows one to try out solutions on the side, look for resources that enhance learning, and they always have that motivator of the “scary” exam at the end. Workshops lack this latter motivator, but the engagement of the class and instructor keeps everyone involved and engaged. Last, of course, home study is an endeavor solely taken to master the course material and apply it to one’s work and passion. Workshops, however, are embedded in a larger AMWA meeting, and thus the networking, personal interactions, and other open sessions all combine to enhance the experience and build enthusiasm for being a better, more effective, writer.

Now which method of learning is better? That, of course, depends on how one learns best, your budget (dollars and time), and many other factors. Perhaps the best answer is to do both. Take a few home study courses first, then attend a local or national AMWA chapter meeting and try a few workshops. They’ll enhance your knowledge, broaden your thinking, and open you to new possibilities and ideas. What more can you ask for as a writer?

Links:
AMWA education program
AMWA workshop descriptions
AMWA self-study workshops
AMWA chapter conference schedule



Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Dial 911: Emergencies in Medical Writing (Open Session 21)


by Amy Karon

Nearly every seasoned medical writer can recall clients and contracts that evolved into the stuff of nightmares. Maybe endless requests for revisions are eating into your sleep time. Or perhaps you realize a high-profile faculty member is self-plagiarizing.

Stay in the profession long enough and scenarios like these are bound to make you hold your head at times. But there’s help. At the 2012 AMWA conference, Scott Kober, MBA, CCMEP,  and Anne Jacobson, MPH, CCMEP, reprised their popular open session on emergencies in medical writing.

Using digital keypads, attendees anonymously chose how they would handle a variety of problems. Lively discussion followed. Here we summarize those debates and dilemmas.

Scenario 1: Your work from long-term clients is drying up after more than 20 years of freelancing. Do you really need a web presence?

You do need a consistent and varied online presence, said Kober and Jacobson. But there are two ways to go about it—by dipping your toes, or going all out.

More cautious medical writers might start by creating their own simple website and LinkedIn profile. Others might hire a marketing and social media consultant to help develop a brand, website, detailed LinkedIn page, and professional Twitter account.

Whichever way you go, your website should include a resume and some sample writing or editing projects. If you’re under a nondisclosure agreement, keep that in mind. Some writers create pieces specifically for their online portfolios.

Scenario 2: Your last client burned you. How do you vet a new one to prevent this from happening again?

“My first-line approach is to e-mail people whom I trust,” Jacobson said. “Luckily, I know a lot of freelance medical writers whom I can vet clients through." She said she tends to avoid asking for feedback from members of AMWA's online discussion groups.

Kober and Jacobson also suggested crafting a checklist of the kinds of clients and projects you want. This will help you develop a broader perspective on whether prospective clients fit your business goals.

Scenario 3: You discover an author whose review article you’re editing is recycling chunks of text from a previous article. Whom do you tell, and how?

Make your client aware of this taboo practice and consider proposing a solution, said Jacobson and Kober. But don’t approach the faculty member yourself. Let the client handle it.

Be aware that copyright infractions can come back to haunt writers, they added. “Some faculty don’t even realize that self-plagiarism is a problem,” said Jacobson. “When this has happened to me, usually the remedy is just to rewrite (a piece) because it obviously can’t go out as it is.”

If a client tries to say self-plagiarizing is all right, rewrite the piece anyway and then don’t take any more work from the client, Kober said. Participants also suggested ensuring clients know that journals use software to detect plagiarism and copyright infringements and that such infractions can result in their being blacklisted.

As for red flags for plagiarism, watch out if a manuscript’s first draft is clean, with perfect punctuation, Kober said: “Plug it into Google and see what comes up.”

Scenario 4: You have a major deadline in three days and your father has been rushed to the emergency department. His physician thinks he’ll be okay, but has to run some more tests.

Do you go and bring your work? Tell your client you can’t make the deadline?

“Mild emergencies come up all the time and you find yourself schlepping your work all sorts of places,” said Jacobson. “The real question is whether to alert your client that there could be a problem. It depends on the client and the relationship.”

But from a client’s perspective, Kober said, “I would want to know as soon as possible. There is nothing worse than hearing on the day of the deadline, ‘Oh, I’m sorry, my dad has been in the hospital for a week and a half.’ I’m sympathetic, but I also wonder why you didn’t tell me before.”

Others recommended giving clients the names of three people they trust to get the work done.  Communication is critical, they agreed – let the hiring manager or the client know right away that you are working at a hospital. Most will appreciate the heads up and adjust their expectations accordingly.

Scenario 5: A client asks you to cover the cost of purchasing full-text references, which is not the norm. Do you renegotiate your contract?

Kober retrieves needed references for freelancers, but encourages them to get what they can on their own. “Ideally, from a client’s perspective, it would be great if we didn’t have to dig up references for you and find them.”

Said Jacobson, “When a client is nickel and diming you about project costs, they are unlikely to be willing to renegotiate a project fee.” She suggested searching on PubMed and restricting access to free, full-text articles. “Open access sources are now pretty good,” she added. “Every once in a while, I spring at the last minute for a $30 reference for a big project.”

Participants noted that AMWA membership includes access to MD Consult. Alumni organizations also sometimes offer limited journal access, and entering the full title of the article in quotes in online search engines also sometimes yields a PDF.

DeepDyve also offers lets you “rent” full-text articles for small amounts of money, members added, although you can’t print or save them to your computer.

Be careful about downloading PDFs and giving to clients, participants added; that can be seen as illegally selling them.

Scenario 6: A client is asking for many more revisions than expected. You are being paid for the extra time, but you’ve taken on other scheduled projects and this one is now keeping you up nights and weekends.

Think about how much you want to keep this client, Kober and Jacobson advised. If you don’t want to work with him or her again, consider politely extracting yourself by explaining that your contract does not include project management. You can also try to renegotiate for more money per hour.

Another approach: Say that you have taken on other projects because the plan did not include this much extra time.

Attendees also suggested building milestone payments into bigger projects so that at the end of 6 months, you’re not crossing your fingers hoping the client doesn’t refuse to pay (because you finally drew the line at further revisions) or goes bankrupt.

Scenario 7: You are writing multiple needs assessments for the same client on the same topic. Can you reuse your work?

“If you’re not willing to turn a blind eye to a faculty self-plagiarizing his own work, how are you willing to turn a blind eye to yourself?” Kober said.

Added Jacobson, “Once you have already done the mental work of understanding the same disease states, it is easier to crank it out. You do have an obligation to submit original material.”

But try for a bit of wiggle room when working with the same client on certain projects, Jacobson suggested. For example, agree to write updated needs assessments for the same client, rather than reinventing the wheel each time.

Scenario 8: After 5 years of full-time freelancing, you’ve decided to take a job. You just interviewed for what seemed like a terrific position, but half the interviewers did not show and no one explained why or followed up. Do you give the company the benefit of the doubt?

Jacobson said she is working on noticing red flags and steering clear of clients and companies who raise them.

“There are far too many employers who think they are doing an employee a favor by giving them the time to talk to them,” added Kober. “It’s a slap in the face. It’s rude and disrespectful.”

One option: Write a courteous letter to human resources explaining what happened and your disappointment. HR departments often appreciate hearing this, participants said. But don’t address your letter to the people who didn’t show up to the interview!

Scenario 9: You (in a client’s role) hire a freelance who checks out and has great references and clips, but turns in awful work. What do you say?

Attendees said they definitely want to hear feedback. Kober said he makes it a personal rule to give it. Jacobson recommends asking for an edited version of a document. If a client is constantly changing a certain word, for example, you can modify your writing style for that client accordingly.

When hiring and applying for work, require and send raw copy, suggested participant Debra Gordon. She added that she plans to send clients an anonymous SurveyMonkey questionnaire so they can provide honest feedback on her work without worrying about jeopardizing their business relationship.


Monday, October 8, 2012

The Passing of the Gavel

Outgoing AMWA President Barbara Snyder passes the gavel to incoming President Douglas Haneline at the organization's annual business meeting, then tries to grab it back!

video
(Video by Mark Bowlby)

Friday, October 5, 2012

Keynote Address: Can Fictional Television Make a Difference in Public Health Education?

Dr. Neal Baer receives the John P. McGovern Medal from Melanie Ross, AMWA past president, as  Barbara Snyder, current president, looks on. The award recognizes preeminent contribution to medical communication.

by Whitney Smalley-Freed

“People don’t get moved and inspired by data,” Dr. Neal Baer, writer for ER, Law and Order SVU, and A Gifted Man, explained to the large audience attending his keynote address on Thursday morning. Dr. Baer told attendees, “reporting on evidenced-based medicine is not enough,” you need the data, but you also need a story to get people to be passionate about a health care topic.  Public story telling draws from our personal experience and lives to tell a story to the public.

Using video clips from Law and Order SVU, Dr. Baer demonstrated how the private stories of patients and clinical data can be turned into public stories that can teach health information to the general population. The first episode addressed the issues raised by a study published in the journal Science showing that children who witness gun violence are more likely to commit gun violence and related it to the child catching an infectious disease. Another episode delved into whether parents have the right to decide not to vaccinate their children and how this could be detrimental to the health of other children.

“Did my show make a difference?” Dr. Baer questioned. A study on an episode of ER depicting a patient diagnosed with cervical cancer caused by HPV indicated that only 19% of viewers knew that HPV could cause cervical cancer before watching the episode but 60% were aware of this after watching the episode.

Dr. Baer explained how BubbleTweets could be used to tie video clips to news articles and actionable steps for addressing health care topics raised by TV dramas. Social media can be used to further the knowledge of seeds planted by television.

During the question and answer session, Dr. Baer stressed the responsibility that television shows have to present health topics accurately since a large portion of the population accepts them as fact. When asked “who is your peer-review,” Dr. Baer explained the review and oversight committees involved in all of his shows.

Dr. Baer suggested that medical writers have the responsibility to start discussions and raise issues that can help establish ethical boundaries for medical frontiers.

Dr. Baer’s charge to AMWA members, “take your own stories…and make them public.” Find stories that move your audience to action.


Thursday, October 4, 2012

Opening Reception in Exhibit Hall





Photos by David S. Durgin www.durginphoto.com


AMWA Starts Early

Hundreds of conference-goers showed up at 7:30 am Thursday for breakfast roundtable discussions of dozens of medical writing and editing topics. (Photo by Mark Bowlby)

A Quick Welcome to AMWA's 72nd Annual Conference

AMWA's 2012 Annual Conference Administrator Brian Bass with a quick audio message for AMWA members in attendance at the AMWA meeting in Sacramento and those at home.



Podcast Powered By Podbean

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Networking at the Annual Conference


Are you getting ready to attend the 2012 AMWA conference? If one of your major goals for the conference is to network to improve career opportunities, you might want to listen now to some tips from career counselor John Hadley on how to navigate the conference networking scene.

I spoke with him for a podcast supplement to the September 2012 AMWA Journal. He had spoken at a meeting of the AMWA Delaware Valley Chapter last year.
--Victoria White


Podcast Powered By Podbean

Saturday, October 22, 2011

The Heart and Soul of AMWA

"AMWA has given me opportunities to learn from the best. I still remember the very first workshop I took: It was 1981, the annual conference in Toronto, and Guy Whitehead taught me more about tables and graphs than I thought possible. I went on to take a lot more workshops and attend open sessions, networking breakfasts, and awards luncheons much like the ones here this week. Over the years, my appreciation has grown for the efforts of all the volunteers but especially the workshop leaders who give so freely of their time and talents. Education is the heart of AMWA’s mission and these volunteers are its soul."
Barbara Snyder, AMWA's new president, at the annual business meeting

Friday, October 21, 2011

Poster Presentations

Poster presentation session Friday morning. Sandra Ripley Distelhorst describes her poster, "Developing Consensus Manuscripts: From Planning to Publishing."

Who Knew Theory Was So Popular?

by Lori Alexander

In an organization as practice-oriented as AMWA, the audience at Thursday morning’s “Using Composition and Persuasion Theories to Improve Your Medical Writing” was extraordinary. Panelists Tom Lang, Helen Hodgson, and Dan Jones had estimated that the topic would draw about 50 attendees, especially considering the always-strong competition among open sessions. All of us were pleasantly surprised to see a standing room–only crowd fill the enormous room!

Tom discussed the evidence base for writing, highlighting the importance of two documents: Document Design: A Review of the Relevant Research and Guidelines for Document Designers. Tom provided an overview of the importance of language usage and framing, a practice that he referred to as the “real ethics problem” for medical writers (above authorship issues, even!). He described framing as a form of cognitive bias in which the context organizes perception. As a classic example of framing, he noted that people are more likely to choose a procedure that has a survival rate of 85% than one that has a fatality rate of 15%.

Helen summarized several composition theories, noting how medical writers can use the theories to evaluate their own work. For example, in critical/cultural studies, researchers examine systemic and cultural injustices inflicted by dominant social groups on those with less power (race, class, gender, sexual orientation, etc) and read texts carefully to determine how language and structure reinforce the power dynamics. “As medical writers, you need to be aware of these issues, and modify writing to redress the power imbalance and reflect understanding of the discourse community,” she said.

Rounding out the session was Dan Jones’ discussion of contemporary persuasion strategies that medical writers can use to reach consensus in the workplace. Dan focused on the science of persuasion—specific strategies that have been scientifically proven to be effective. Among the most widely used are six weapons or principles of influence described by Robert Cialdini: reciprocity, commitment and consistency, social proof, liking, authority, and scarcity. Dan encouraged attendees to think about how to put these principles into action not only in their writing but in their workplace relationships.

2011 AMWA Salary Survey (Open Session 6)

by Karamarie Fecho

If there’s one thing that all medical writers have in common, it’s the need to earn a living. We may be passionate about our writing, but passion doesn’t pay the bills. The much-anticipated results of the 2011 AMWA Salary Survey were released Thursday afternoon during a presentation by Susan Bairnsfather at the annual AMWA meeting.

After listening to the presentation, I have to say that, quite frankly, AMWA’s members appear to be weathering the economic downturn very well and, dare I say, even thriving. Both traditional business employees and freelancers, part-time and full-time, showed an increase in their annual income from 2007 (the last year the salary survey was administered) to 2011. The increase in employee income was ahead of the inflation rate—12.9% vs. 1.3%.

While US government–reported inflation rates are admittedly low and do not reflect true purchasing power (a point raised by a participant at the presentation), the reported increase in salary was large enough that one could infer that, at the very least, medical writers are faring well in these tough economic times. Interestingly, however, the feeling among many who listened to the presentation was one of caution regarding interpretation of the survey results. Several people pointed out that the survey response rate was down by 10% and that the survey itself did not “capture” unemployed (or even underemployed) medical writers.

Whether these concerns are warranted or the result of an internalization of the economic situation is unclear. It is true, however, that the survey, like most surveys, had limitations, including the low response rate and a lack of survey participation by employees whose employers (primarily pharmaceutical companies) prohibited them from responding to the survey. Regardless of these (admittedly valid) concerns, this presentation left me feeling a renewed sense of validation for my profession and my profession’s economic worth.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Should the Skull Be an Inviolable Zone of Privacy?

Keynote Speaker Focuses on Bioethics

by Faith Reidenbach

“We are becoming cyborgs,” one of the founders of neuroethics, Dr. Paul Root Wolpe, told the large audience assembled for his keynote address on Thursday morning. He wasn’t playing on the fact that AMWA’s conference falls near Halloween this year. As an increasing number of people use artificial organs to survive, prosthetic limbs to move, or brain waves to communicate, we are becoming “semicreated creatures,” Dr. Wolpe said, and the accelerating pace of these advances “may induce a phase change beyond which we can predict nothing.”

By juxtaposing photos, Dr. Wolpe demonstrated that a real-life woman who has a brain implant for a neurologic disorder looks remarkably like Star Trek Captain Jean-Luc Picard after he was assimilated by The Borg. And just as Picard discovered when he battled the Borg Queen, “our last great freedom”—the freedom not to reveal the contents of our minds—may someday be in jeopardy. Using functional MRI, scientists at Carnegie Mellon University have taken a baby step toward mind reading:  they have shown that they can identify the unique brain activation patterns generated when a person thinks of any one of dozens of nouns. Later, with about 75% accuracy, they determined what noun a person was thinking of, even nouns their computer model had not encountered.

Dr. Wolpe explained that according to other studies, brain imaging can distinguish traits, such as extroversion versus introversion; whether a person has racist attitudes; what languages a prisoner of war can read; a person’s intentions on a very simple level—the intention to add or subtract; and whether a person is more likely than average to engage in violent behavior.

“Should the skull be an inviolable zone of privacy?” he asked. The emerging field of what he calls neuroprivacy exemplifies that ethics is much more than an inquiry into right and wrong. “Ethical consensus is a social, evolving process in which the media plays a primary role.”

Dr. Wolpe also discussed “cosmetic” neurology. Reporting that 20% of scientists acknowledge using a psychostimulant such as Ritalin, Adderall, or modafinil, he posed the question of whether use of this drug class should be required of professionals such as pilots and surgeons. Other examples of cosmetic neurology are the use of propranolol for memory suppression, research by Nobel Laureate Eric Kantel on memory enhancers, and, much more questionably, the use of oxytocin spray as a “trust inducer.” What are the ethical implications of spraying Liquid Trust on flowers given to a girlfriend?

Turning to the hot-button issue of prenatal genetic testing, Dr. Wolpe said he is not opposed, but that scientists should own up to the fact that “it’s eugenics” and talk about how to manage the consequences of the testing. For example, he pointed out, a disease such as cystic fibrosis might be cured by the time a child with the CFTR gene reaches reproductive age; should a fetus with the gene necessarily be aborted?

Medicine will become a “risk management system,” he predicted, with individuals receiving long printouts of their genetic profiles. Not all parts of the profiles will relate to disease; for example, some scientists believe there are genetic markers for criminal behavior. “What do we do with that information?”

In all of these areas, “the science is running way ahead of the ethics,” Dr. Wolpe said. The goal should not be to hurry to arrive at cut-and-dried decisions; rather, what’s needed are “robust ethical conversation with people representing different points of view.”

Dr. Wolpe encouraged listeners to visit the home page of the Center for Ethics at Emory University, which he currently directs. At Emory he is the Asa Griggs Candler Professor of Bioethics; Raymond Schinazi Distinguished Research Professor of Jewish Bioethics; and professor of medicine, pediatrics, psychiatry, neuroscience and biological behavior, and sociology. Dr. Wolpe also serves as the senior bioethicist at NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). He is co-editor of the American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB) and editor-in-chief of AJOB‒Neuroscience. He sits on the editorial boards of more than a dozen professional journals in medicine and ethics. Dr. Wolpe is a past president of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, a fellow of the Hastings Center, and a fellow of the College of Physicians of Philadelphia, the country’s oldest medical society.

Related Links
Dr. Wolpe's Web page
Dr. Wolpe on "60 Minutes"

The Mission Ahead

“As medical communicators who are part of our profession’s preeminent organization, we must work together to remain true to our mission. We must work hard to build momentum. We must work hard to position our organization as a global thought leader on the most pressing issues of our profession. And we must continue to uphold the highest ethical standards. Thank you for the part you play in support of these noble goals.”

AMWA President Melanie Fridl Ross, in her opening remarks Thursday at the annual conference

AMWA, caricatured

AMWA is meeting this year in a beach town, if not on the beach itself. Lending a bit of the flavor of the beach boardwalk, caricature artists went to work with willing AMWA members at Wednesday night's opening reception. The reception was sponsored by RPS Inc.

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Calendar of Events

Here is a Google calendar of events at this year's AMWA conference. If you click on the event, you will see further details and the room locations. Note that this list does not include the 100 workshops! The breakfast roundtables and coffee klatches also are not listed individually.

If you use Google calendar on your smartphone, please feel free to use the whole calendar or simply choose the events that you would like to add. The calendar will remain posted in a sidebar on the blog, so if you are viewing the blog on a computer, you will be seeing double. (On a smartphone, in the mobile version of the site, the sidebar does not display.)

AMWA and Ethics

If you look through the AMWA annual conference program, you may notice one word appearing again and again.

Ethics.

It’s there on the very first page, where AMWA President Melanie Fridl Ross mentions the role of medical communicators in upholding the highest ethical principles

It’s there in the title of the keynote speech: Re-creation: Ethics and the Biotechnological Restructuring of Life, which is to be delivered by Paul Root Wolpe, PhD, a professor of bioethics at Emory University and director of Emory’s Center for Ethics.

There are the open sessions, “Clinical Trial Ethics: Placebos and Other Issues,” and “Publication Ethics: Moving Beyond Authorship.”

There are the workshops:
  • Preparing CME Materials: Concepts, Strategies, and Ethical Issues
  • Ethics of Communicating Regulated Drug Development Activities
  • Ethics for Regulatory and Research Communicators
  • Fundamentals of Ethics and Practical Application
  • Ethics for Science and Medicine Communicators
  • Ethical Standards in Medical Publication

A self-study course “Essential Ethics for Medical Communicators” is also being launched at this conference.

I had an opportunity recently to speak with Cindy Hamilton, a past president of AMWA, who teaches some of the ethics workshops and has been a driving force in AMWA’s increased emphasis on ethics.

Listen to the Audio Interview With Cindy Hamilton.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

AMWA Jacksonville Conference About to Begin


Well, that was fast. It seems like we just wrapped up last year's AMWA conference blog, and now it is time to gear up for the Jacksonville meeting, which gets under way late Wednesday.

A few things to think about before you head to Florida, or in my case, a different part of Florida:

  • Lori Alexander, editor of the AMWA Journal, has a nice post over at her blog mentioning some of the great benefits such as museum discounts that she and the other local arrangements coordinators have made for conference attendees. You can also read about the Florida Chapter's drive to collect donations for Hubbard House, a Jacksonville shelter for victims of domestic violence. 
  • The clock is ticking down on making arrangements for the discounted rate ($16) for the airport shuttle. Reservations must be made 48 hours before arrival to get the discounted rate.
  • Read "Maximize Your Conference Experience" on the AMWA Web site, so that you can, you know, maximize your conference experience.
  • The AMWA Conference blog is always looking for more contributors. If you know how to write, you know how to blog. If you are interested in contributing, please get in touch with me. I edit all posts and take care of getting them up on the blog. In addition to text, I would also be happy to consider photographs, audio, and video contributions. The more voices, the better the blog. E-mail me at VictoriaJWhite@gmail.com. 
  • Follow official AMWA tweets at: http://twitter.com/AmMedWriters. If you are tweeting about the conference, please use the hashtag #amwa11 so it will be easy for people to find tweets about the conference.


Friday, January 14, 2011

Participate in AMWA's 71st Annual Conference

A message from the American Medical Writers Association (AMWA) headquarters:

We need your help to continue offering excellent choices for conference attendees. Please consider volunteering to serve as a workshop leader or to colead an AMWA workshop with an established workshop leader at AMWA’s 2011 Annual Conference in Jacksonville.

AMWA’s workshops are critical to the well-known and respected AMWA certificate program. Workshop leaders enjoy a great deal of satisfaction that comes from sharing their professional knowledge and skills with their colleagues through AMWA’s education program. Information about becoming a workshop leader can be found on the Web site on the Information for Workshop Leaders page.

The deadline to volunteer to be a workshop leader or co-leader is February 15. Other opportunities are also available if you wish to volunteer to participate in the program for the 2011 conference. Separate requests for volunteers have been sent out, and links are provided below.

Deadline to submit a short session short session proposal is January 13.
Deadline for poster abstracts is March 18.
Deadline for Breakfast Roundtable topic proposals is March 31.
Deadline for Coffee and Dessert Klatch proposals is March 31.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Good Publications Practice 2 and You (Open Session 36)

by Heather Haley

Navigating the current medical publishing environment is challenging, whether it’s figuring out which of the many CONSORT statement extensions applies to your project or collecting all the conflict of interest disclosures from ten authors in four countries. However, success starts with knowing Good Publication Practice 2. Published in October 2009 in the British Medical Journal, Good Publication Practice 2 (GPP2) captures the best current standards for communicating medical research sponsored by companies.  (For a copy of GPP2, visit the Web site http://www.gpp-guidelines.org, where you can also watch a webcast about it.)

Covered in the AMWA 2010 conference open session, Navigating the Current Medical Publications Environment, key GPP2 recommendations include:
  • Written agreements between the company and academic-physician authors.
    • These author agreements can address a host of issues from access to data, author obligations to disclose conflicts of interest, author responsibilities for timely publications. The GPP2 paper has a great checklist of what to include in an author’s agreement.
  • Contributorship model for the acknowledgements section for people who do not meet the ICJME authorship criteria as well as the role of the sponsoring company in funding and executing of research.
    • Suggested language for contributorship is: “The authors would like to thank D, YZ Pharmaceuticals, for overall management of the trial and E, WX Medical Writing, for drafting the manuscript.”
    • The role of the sponsor in the medical research needs to be detailed. Suggested template language that can be adapted to each situation is: “In collaboration with A and B, YZ Pharmaceuticals, designed the study, analysed, and interpreted the data, and edited the report. Data were recorded at participating clinical centres and maintained by YZ Pharmaceuticals. All authors had full access to the data." If journal submission requirements do not accommodate this information, then put it in the cover letter accompanying the submission.
  • Creating publication steering committees to identify and oversee the communication of research results in presentations and journal publications.
    • Visit the GPP2 website for ideas on who belongs on publication steering committees.
The key theme for GPP2 is transparency. In this current environment of controversy, more disclosure is the rule of thumb when in doubt. The GPP2 authors recommend going above and beyond disclosing conflicts of interest and medical writing support on posters as well as publications. Since no one becomes a Wall Street Journal story for disclosing conflicts of interest.

A highlight for GPP2 is that the update was a more collaborative process seeking input from all the key stakeholders. 116 individuals representing academic centers, journal editors and publishers, medical communication agencies, freelance medical writers, pharmaceutical, medical device, biotechnology, and professional organizations provided comment on the first draft of GPP2.

The Navigating Medical Publications talk was attended by about 30 people, and honestly I was surprised by the number of people who didn’t know the GPP2 update had come out. New publishing or research reporting guidelines can be found at the Equator network. Read Good Publications Practice 2, for yourself. It’s definitely a must if you are taking the Certified Medical Publication Professional exam (CMPP). But also, pass along some of the useful checklists or template language to your colleagues or clients to help make navigating the current medical publishing environment a little easier for everyone.

Friday, November 19, 2010

AMWA 2011 Annual Conference Committee

by Steve Palmer

As the coordinator of next year’s AMWA annual conference in Jacksonville, Florida, (Oct. 20 - 22, 2011) I would like to announce the members of the 2011 Annual Conference Committee.
Special interest sessions coordinator—Kathy Spiegel
General interest sessions coordinator—Marianne Mallia
Short sessions coordinator—Scott Thompson
Poster presentations coordinator—Anne Marie Weber-Main
Roundtable breakfast coordinators—Yeshi Mikyas and Michelle Zakson
Coordinator for coffee/dessert klatches—Jude Richard
Creative readings chair—Jim Hudson
Local host committee chairs—Lori Alexander and Deb Whippen
These volunteers have committed their time and energy to making our next conference as valuable and enlightening as any of its predecessors. If you have an idea for a topic, a potential speaker, or anything else that could enhance next year’s annual conference, or if you would otherwise like to help one of these committee members with their portion of the planning, please get in touch with them.

[Contact information is available in the members-only section of the AMWA Web site.]



Wednesday, November 17, 2010

The Conference Never Ends

by Lori Alexander
AMWA Journal Editor

The session rooms are shut down and the hallways of the Milwaukee Hilton are no longer full of AMWA members. Although the networking conversations and the sessions are but memories, the conference experience is not over. Not by a long shot.

I think that all of us attendees agree that the conference was a wonderful learning opportunity, and on some days, during some time slots, we wished we could have cloned ourselves so that we could take advantage of more than one session. Because cloning has not been perfected yet, the AMWA Journal is once again bringing coverage of conference sessions to all AMWA members. This year, the Journal is going one step forward to ensure that the conference never ends for us.

In keeping with tradition, the December issue will contain brief reports on several conference sessions, and they will be featured as part of an online-exclusive section of the Journal. Be sure to watch for that section to go live on the AMWA Web site in early December. Never before has news from the conference been made available in the Journal so quickly after the conference! The section will also include the inaugural address by our new President, Melanie Fridl Ross, MSJ, ELS, an introduction to the members of the new Executive Committee, and details about the many awards given out at the Sablack Awards Dinner on Friday night.

The March 2011 will feature more brief reports of sessions, as well as an enhanced version of Marianne Mallia’s Swanberg Address: “Demons and Idols…and a Blue Corvette.” If you were at the dinner, I’m sure you agree that Marianne’s speech chronicled an amazing career, with inspiration and applicability to us all. I’m so happy we can share her speech with the entire membership through the Journal. The March issue will also feature some accounts from first-time attendees. It’s always good to see the conference experience through their eyes. And I hope that the articles prompt other members to say, “Hey, I think I’ll go to the conference next year!”

What’s new this year about conference coverage in the Journal? Thanks to the tremendous generosity of many open session moderators, full-length feature articles on select sessions will be included in future issues of the Journal. I thank the many moderators who, in addition to assembling a panel and developing a successful session, also agreed to work with their speakers to write a manuscript and submit it to the Journal. As a result, all AMWA members, whether they came to Milwaukee or not, will be able to benefit from the expertise of these panelists. A manuscript based on the AMWA-CMR survey has already been submitted, and several more are in process.

Thanks to the AMWA Conference Blog, you don’t have to wait patiently for reports. The blog is a great way to get highlights from sessions while waiting for Journal coverage. And though the blog entries will be winding down soon, the educational value of the conference is never-ending.

Related links:
AMWA Journal Blog
About the AMWA Journal

Defining and Refining Medical Communication: Competencies, Research, and Theories (Open Session 16)

by Mary Wessling

At Open Session 16 of the annual conference, panel members approached the issue of how to discover the appropriate measurements, and how to construct a program using AMWA resources, that enhance the competency of our members as medical communicators.

David Chernow, a scientific communications consultant for Eli Lilly and Company, described the Medical Writer Competency Model developed by the core team members of the Drug Information Association Medical Writing Special Interest Area Community. This model (I'll call it the DIA model for convenience) was developed by a team of experts from around the world who employ medical writers or who use medical writers as part of their jobs. Overall, the model looked at the knowledge, skills, and behavior that are intrinsic to success as a medical writer, and then in particular, what different categories of jobs in medical writing would demand. The core competency, they agreed, is the ability to tell a scientific story. The model could be used by an individual to assess his or her abilities to enter the field, and also by employers to judge the suitability of applicants for a job they need to fill. It can also be used to train present employees for transitions to other jobs within the organization. David stressed that the model has its limitations, and among them, that it does not prioritize the skills in assessing competency.